Something like: simplify the registration process, change the color scheme, add the ability to export to., etc.
Many times I see software thumbed down because the reviewer does require the software or it see it as necessary. Additionally, improvements should be recommended that would provide the software with a better bang-for-buck ratio. My understanding is that the publishers require the software to be assessed and evaluated. I enjoy the freeware recommendations and find them very valuable as well.
The fact is that we have full functionality of a commercial product at no cost. The publishers of the Software offers on GOATD provide us with software (sometimes for life, other times for a period only). I would like to raise something that has been a concern for a while.
0 kommentar(er)
